#18238: Options ignored in show() of 3D objects
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
egourgoulhon | Status: needs_info
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.7
defect | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Volker Braun
graphics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: Eric | ff3731d4078f7db2caf2b62cb8cc45b777753ef9
Gourgoulhon | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/18238 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
Hi! I don't have tons of time, but I have a few questions.
1. It looks like what happened here is that there was some error somewhere
in all the zillions of viewing changes that should have used the
dictionary `opts` and instead used the dictionary `kwds`, but that the
current branch fixes this oversight. Is that correct? If so, that sounds
awesome.
1. Is the comment above correct that `kwds` is incorrectly used and `opts`
should be in another function too? Or is that referring to some other
issue? In that event this should be "needs work", of course.
1. Is the issue about unhandled keywords (possibly for sending to other
viewer commands) a new regression in 6.6? I get
{{{
$ ./sage
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Sage Version 6.5, Release Date: 2015-02-17 │
│ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface. │
│ Type "help()" for help. │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
sage: show(sphere(), heyheyhey=35)
sage:
}}}
with no problems (also tested in 6.4.1) so I assume that, although I can
see both sides of this argument (validation/not validating), maybe this
isn't the place to have that discussion, and a new ticket is warranted for
that.
Okay, grading and writing an exam beckon and must be finished within 1.5
hours, so I hope this helps clarify things. (?)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18238#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
