#18238: Options ignored in show() of 3D objects
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
egourgoulhon | Status: needs_info
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.7
defect | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Volker Braun
graphics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: Eric | ff3731d4078f7db2caf2b62cb8cc45b777753ef9
Gourgoulhon | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/18238 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by vbraun):
I agree that there are a couple of places where I used kwds instead of pts
when refactoring. This is what this ticket is about.
The entire option handling for plots is IMHO badly done. Its quite
complicated and independent from the actual plotting, so it should be
factored out and tested separately.
As for `_process_viewing_options`, its not clear to me whether it is
supposed to remove ALL valid keywords or only the ones for the particular
viewer. I can read the code to see what it does right now, and you can
probably build a bandaid around it to warn about unused options, but thats
IMHO not a well-designed solution.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18238#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
