#18152: Universal Cyclotomic Field implementation using libgap
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: number fields | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Reviewers: Jean-Philippe Labbé
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vdelecroix/18152 | 28c23ce280985112ea43f0bea36a76952a64ff8e
Dependencies: #18153 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jipilab):
Perhaps one could add a comment/warning in the beginning of the file also
to mention that GAP uses a dense representation and a link to the current
ticket.
If there is a use case popping up in the future we could revive the code
as Nicolas mentioned.
@Christian: In your actual usage (not tests), is sparse faster than the
current dense representation of GAP?
Also: I just updated to 6.7.beta3 on my computer and pulled the ticket.
There was a small conflict in the file
src/doc/en/reference/rings_standard/index.rst
Should I push the resolution of the conflict here?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18152#comment:42>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
