#18350: Adams operator
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: elixyre | Owner:
Type: task | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jean-Baptiste | Reviewers:
Priez | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | fc8726a50725479d84aa9a07f55e28e1f879880a
u/elixyre/ticket/18350 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by elixyre):
Hi,
That is easy to implement an ugly `nfold_coproduct` (as I did) but I don't
know how to implement an `nfold_product`. Where implements it?
Furthermore, if you want to go in this way it seems to be great to be able
to do that:
{{{
sage: h = MyFavoriteHopfAlgebras(QQ)
sage: id = h.identity_map
sage: mu = h.product
sage: op = tensor([mu, id])
sage: a,b,c = h.some_three_elements()
sage: op(tensor([a,b,c]))
a*b # c
}}}
This feature exists? If this exists I'm agree to implement those
`nfold_coproduct` and `nfold_product` operators but otherwise I assume
this feature should be implemented before.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18350#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
