#18350: Adams operator
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: elixyre | Owner:
Type: task | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jean-Baptiste | Reviewers:
Priez | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | fc8726a50725479d84aa9a07f55e28e1f879880a
u/elixyre/ticket/18350 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Yeah, I see your point. I am not super keen on "coproduct power"
either, as it's really the analogue (in fact essentially the dual) of
n-ary products (which of course are computed iteratively from binary
products), and less so of powering (for
composition/multiplication). In particular, `n` is more related to the
number of factors in the tensor than to the number of times the
coproduct needs to be iterated.
I agree that tab-completion-wise it would be nice to have a name such
as `coproduct_...`. I could live with `coproduct_nfold`. But any
better suggestion is welcome!
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18350#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
