#18109: Restructure IntegerListLex code
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/18109 | d46541fb29ca682163ba62e66e48fc8128f2c825
Dependencies: #18181, #18184 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:44 nthiery]:
> Maybe slightly more systematic class names could
> help; say: `IntegerLists`, `IntegerListsLex`, `IntegerListsBackend`,
> `IntegerListsLexBackend`.
Do you find `...Backend` more clear than `...Impl`? If you care a lot, I
can change it, but it smells like bike-shedding.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18109#comment:63>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
