#18109: Restructure IntegerListLex code
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/ticket/18109 | 434a15236a27b2d6aef0ab95877aa396e86b1cf8
Dependencies: #18181, #18184 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:70 nthiery]:
> I see your point. Still I find useful to give the reader a hint that,
> in this case, there is such a correspondence.
There is not, even in this case. Note that `IntegerListsLex` is just
`IntegerLists` with a classcall method and a default backend. I can easily
create an `IntegerLists` instance with a `IntegerListsBackend_invlex`
backend or an `IntegerListsLex` instance with a different backend.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18109#comment:71>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
