#18407: Fix standard_packages(), optional_packages(), and
experimental_packages()
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.7
defect | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers:
distribution | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | c400ee6b177b5de2bee7a4467011fa3a75110f27
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/18407 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> * that's only part of the problem,
> * I was going to rather fix it by adding a `--machine-readable` (say)
option to `sage-list-packages` (at #16759, but I haven't written any code
yet, also because of #15642).
Well, that branch fixes the old function, and has the nice property of
being ready and implemented. We will still need those functions in the
long run, so it is not incompatible with what you plan on doing anyway. I
really have nothing against seeing this parsing code rewritten in the
future.
I am writing a doc patch at the moment, which uses these functions to make
sure that all packages appear in our doc.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18407#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
