#18407: Fix standard_packages(), optional_packages(), and
experimental_packages()
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: positive_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.7
defect | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Leif Leonhardy
distribution | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | cc0230454137f31663816e3da5034bdcc40c7c30
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/18407 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> And I won't complain about removing `lambda` I love so much, nor
efficiency w.r.t. using `in` '''and''' `.rfind()`. ;-)
I would have loved to do it with lambda functions only, but I really
needed to define a variable here `:-P`
Thank you very much for the review. The list of packages is built by
#18408 `:-)`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18407#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
