#18407: Fix standard_packages(), optional_packages(), and 
experimental_packages()
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  ncohen                 |       Status:  positive_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.7
  defect                 |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:         |    Reviewers:  Leif Leonhardy
  distribution           |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  cc0230454137f31663816e3da5034bdcc40c7c30
  Nathann Cohen          |     Stopgaps:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  public/18407           |
   Dependencies:         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by leif):

 * status:  needs_review => positive_review
 * reviewer:   => Leif Leonhardy


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:14 ncohen]:
 > > Seems you already noticed the ''pas installé''(?)
 >
 > Indeed. But come on, that's written in french on my console too `;-)`

 I thought you'd just `s/not/pas/`...

 [[BR]]

 And I won't complain about removing `lambda` I love so much, nor
 efficiency w.r.t. using `in` '''and''' `.rfind()`. ;-)

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18407#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to