#18310: Finite dimensional modules with basis: improved conversions to vectors 
and
matrices
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery            |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.7
      Component:  linear algebra     |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Nicolas M. ThiƩry  |    Reviewers:  Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/categories/fin_dim_modules_with_basis_vector_matrix-18310|  
035418cccaab72f73565c50d3e5b6391d294a467
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Replying to [comment:13 jdemeyer]:
 > Answering my own question: for normal free modules, it seems that
 `matrix()` just returns `basis_matrix()`. That's an annoying
 inconsistency. I actually see no reason to have this `matrix()` alias for
 `basis_matrix()`.
 >
 > Proposal: define `matrix(*args, **kwds)` in free modules which calls
 `basis_matrix()` if no arguments are given (this should be deprecated) and
 calls the modified(*) categories implementation if any argument is
 supplied.

 +1.

 Do you agree that this should go in #10672 rather than here? It would
 be weird to have matrix call a method that is not yet available from
 the categories. As a first step, we could just deprecate
 `FreeModule.matrix` for now. What do you think?

 > (*) The `base_ring` of the resulting matrix should be the
 `coordinate_ring`, not the `base_ring` of the free module.

 Gasp, another inconsistency: most other modules in Sage (polynomial
 rings, matrix space, ...) don't define coordinate_ring: there it's
 assumed that the coefficients of elements live in `base_ring`.  Ok,
 clarifying this is for #10672 since it's not about this specific
 method, but about all uses of `base_ring`.

 Thanks for the thoughts

 Cheers,
                                Nicolas

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18310#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to