#16953: Faster enumeration of points for toric varieties
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: algebraic | Resolution:
geometry | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Volker Braun | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 49a72410a19784c05c9fe320e28382df7e5b7338
u/vbraun/faster_enumeration | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vbraun):
Replying to [comment:15 vdelecroix]:
> Replying to [comment:13 vbraun]:
> > IMHO `copy(zero)` is much more readable that `zero[:]`.ething that
isn't even cythonized.
>
> And you forgot that `copy(X)` needs `from copy import copy` which is
very readable
I don't see how mixing up function bodies with import statements is ever
going to yield a viable argument. In any case, I stand by my opinion that
`copy(zero)` is much more readable that `zero[:]`.
> Really? what about #18411?
There is no code on that ticket, and even if there were it depends on
unfinished tickets. Its also unclear to me if it is ever going to be
merged as some people have previously expressed a strong opinion on sage-
devel for something that is named after cartesian product instead of
`itertools.product`. In any case, this ticket long predates #18411 and is
ready to be merged right now.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16953#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
