#18175: Implement categories for topological and metric spaces and related
categories
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  tscrim             |        Owner:  tscrim
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.8
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  geometry,          |    Merged in:
  topology, sd67                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw   |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  5796cbd4fd66bdad4df405a4942f47e9d9d9c69a
  public/categories/topological_metric_spaces-18175|     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #18174 #17160      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by tscrim):

 I don't really hold a strong opinion on the definition of a manifold, so
 perhaps for the sake of clarity, we'll make this be local homeomorphic to
 '''k'''^n^, where '''k''' is a topological field.

 However this brings up another point in the design for manifolds. When I
 first wrote this category, I was thinking all manifolds would be real and
 a subcategory for those who allow carry a complex structure. The reason
 for this is I was thinking of complex Lie groups, which can behave
 differently than their real/rational/positive-char counterparts. Yet I'm
 wondering if we should instead just parameterize the category and this
 gives a more consistent interface (and if we need a special complex
 subcategory, we still might want that parameterized by the complex field).

 A more concrete (better) question is what do you want a complex manifold
 to be? Wikipedia says it is a manifold with holomorphic transition maps.
 Or should this be a smooth manifold over the complex numbers? In other
 words, should the notion of differentiability be inherent in the base
 field?

 Thoughts?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18175#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to