#18175: Implement categories for topological and metric spaces and related
categories
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  tscrim             |        Owner:  tscrim
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.8
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  geometry,          |    Merged in:
  topology, sd67                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw   |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  95a30aa57fc62f23a884790b57835d107d8bdeef
  public/categories/topological_metric_spaces-18175|     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #18174 #17160      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by tscrim):

 It still seems like we are having an assumption that all manifolds can
 inherently be realized over '''R'''. This was my initial assumption too,
 and so manifolds that could be locally homoemorphic to '''C'''^d^ were a
 special case.

 However I feel like it would be best for `Manifolds` to be over an
 arbitrary topological field (which will require some very mild changes).
 So then the heirarchy for manifolds then be:
 {{{
      Manifolds
         |
   Differentiable
         |
       Smooth
    /         \
 Analytic    AlmostComplex
                 |
              Complex
 }}}
 Do we think we should add a stub category for PL and/or (pseudo)
 Riemannian manifolds? How about `ManifoldsWithBoundary` as a supercategory
 of `Manifolds` (and how many of these extra structures lift to the
 boundary)?

 A question for CW complexes, should the elements of a CW complex be the
 cells or the points of the topological space? Right now, I'm taking the
 former approach, but I feel this might be an abuse as these should be
 subobjects of the category (Nicolas, any wisdom to impart on this?). If
 this seems like a non-trivial issue, I can split this ticket into 2 parts;
 one for the manifolds and one for the CW complexes.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18175#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to