#18175: Implement categories for topological and metric spaces and related
categories
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  tscrim             |        Owner:  tscrim
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.8
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  geometry,          |    Merged in:
  topology, sd67                     |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw   |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  95a30aa57fc62f23a884790b57835d107d8bdeef
  public/categories/topological_metric_spaces-18175|     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:  #18174 #17160      |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by tscrim):

 Hey Basile,

 I'm not quite sure what you're proposing we should do for organizing the
 manifolds category. For the (a) <=> (b) condition, we aren't doing any
 sort of checking. By a user constructing a object (parent) in a category,
 the user is simply promising that it carries that structure.

 We could make it so there is no parameterization of the categories (on the
 underlying field), but instead have the condition for objects to be in the
 category that their base field be '''R''' or '''C''' as appropriate.
 However I think this leads to ambiguity of dimension (e.g., for complex
 manifolds, do you want the real or complex dimension?) and what you want
 your charts to be.

 I think for fields like '''Q''', the metric gives a good notation of
 convergence, limits, and hence differential calculus. So, e.g., for smooth
 manifolds, the transition maps would still be smooth maps (just now in
 terms of '''Q''' calculus instead of '''R''' calculus).

 Are you perhaps suggesting we should do something like the digram in
 comment:21?

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18175#comment:25>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to