#18558: Test all installed optional packages by default
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen             |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.8
      Component:  doctest framework  |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen,     |    Reviewers:
  Jeroen Demeyer                     |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:  u/jdemeyer/18558   |  59af6983b05b6581ef1282cdec41d6e63ad82459
   Dependencies:  #18456, #18124,    |     Stopgaps:
  #18559, #18563, #18579, #18581     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by kcrisman):

 > I may not have said this enough times: you add dependencies which I do
 not consider dependencies, and you do this without asking first, without
 caring in any way.

 This is just part of the development process.  It is very natural that
 sometimes developers and reviewers will disagree on what is required for
 review.  This is orthogonal to caring - I'd say it even shows care,
 because others might just say "needs work" and then not have a possible
 approach.

 > So I give up, because the slave's whipping has lasted sufficiently.

 That is also part of the open development process; certainly there are
 plenty of times I've given up on either writing or reviewing because I
 either didn't understand or couldn't satisfy others.  I don't think that
 anyone is saying you are required to work on any of the dependencies, or
 indeed required to work on this ticket!  Perhaps the person who suggests
 the change is necessary can take the responsibility, or they may choose
 not to.  That's the point of a volunteer project.  Perhaps another
 reviewer would also have different standards or expectations, and they may
 come along and decide that adding some of these dependencies was in error.

 Anyway, it sounds like #18456 is the most important one, and I don't think
 this or its dependency list is standing in the way, thankfully!

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18558#comment:112>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to