#18558: Test all installed optional packages by default
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: doctest framework | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Nathann Cohen, | Reviewers: Jeroen Demeyer, Karl-
Jeroen Demeyer | Dieter Crisman
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: u/jdemeyer/18558 | Commit:
Dependencies: #18456, #18124, | e3f463d32d4d05a55f8cee4315bb01d9c5de2da2
#18559, #18563, #18579, #18581 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
I think we should find a way to remove optional tags that aren't actually
optional (`scons`? `python2`?). It's just confusing.
The following doesn't provide me any way to tell that the problem was with
a `gambit` optional test (it's not broken, I just broke it to test this.
{{{
sage -t src/sage/game_theory/gambit_docs.py
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/game_theory/gambit_docs.py", line 124, in
sage.game_theory.gambit_docs
Failed example:
g[int(2), int(0)][int(0)] = int(0) # optional - gambit
Exception raised:
<snip>
IndexError: Provided strategy index 2 out of range for player 0
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
1 of 13 in sage.game_theory.gambit_docs
[12 tests, 1 failure, 0.14 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t src/sage/game_theory/gambit_docs.py # 1 doctest failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
}}}
I'm saying that this works, apparently, but doesn't give any indication
that it failed due to an ''optional'' test. 'Needs work' or at least
'needs info'.
Do you have a suggestion for how to test
http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=24db9dc2556b7da256e5ef7e0a127e460ad83979
by the way? Do you have an optional package I could test that isn't up-
to-date? I hate to regress to a previous Sage, install the package, then
tediously build Sage back up to `develop` to try this...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18558#comment:119>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
