#18589: isogeny efficiency improvement
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  cremona                |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.8
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:         |    Reviewers:
  elliptic curves        |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
  isogeny                |  ad56369f5def8060575b6567342dedb28a447293
        Authors:  John   |     Stopgaps:
  Cremona                |
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  u/cremona/18589        |
   Dependencies:         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by cremona):

 Replying to [comment:37 jdemeyer]:
 > Replying to [comment:34 cremona]:
 > > Its computation is short, and its factoring takes < 1 hour.
 > Then why did the computation of the isogenies without this patch take
 days? What was the bottleneck? I find it hard to believe that the calls to
 `mult()` can take so much time.

 Me too, but as I tried to explain the script I was running was computing
 the isogeny class many times.  I am rerunning just E.isogeny_class() under
 6.7 now and will report back (but this ticket need not wait).

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18589#comment:40>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to