#18757: Poset catalog: Element type of BooleanLattice, IntegerCompositions and
IntegerPartitions
-----------------------------+---------------------------------
   Reporter:  jmantysalo     |            Owner:
       Type:  defect         |           Status:  new
   Priority:  minor          |        Milestone:  sage-wishlist
  Component:  combinatorics  |         Keywords:  posets
  Merged in:                 |          Authors:
  Reviewers:                 |  Report Upstream:  N/A
Work issues:                 |           Branch:
     Commit:                 |     Dependencies:
   Stopgaps:                 |
-----------------------------+---------------------------------
 {{{
 print type(Posets.IntegerPartitions(3)[1])
 print type(Posets.IntegerCompositions(3)[1])
 print type(Posets.BooleanLattice(3)[1])
 }}}

 says

 {{{
 <type 'tuple'>
 <class
 'sage.combinat.composition.Compositions_n_with_category.element_class'>
 <type 'sage.rings.integer.Integer'>
 }}}

 This seems unlogical. There is a class for integer partitions just like
 integer compositions. Also why don't `BooleanLattice(n)` return poset with
 (sub)sets as an elements? Of course there could be parameter like
 `elements='integers'` in all three.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18757>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to