#18756: Use coerce actions in the category framework
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: coercion | Resolution:
Keywords: cython, coercion, | Merged in:
actions, categories | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Authors: Simon King | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | dfba8b8dfcaf23f76d4f62f575b862aba48b0be8
u/SimonKing/combinatorial_free_module_cython_coercion| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by tscrim):
* reviewer: => Travis Scrimshaw
Comment:
+1 to including category support for actions. So I'm happy with this patch
modulo this change:
{{{#!diff
- NOTE:
-
- If a parent implements :meth:`_get_action_` then it has
precedence
- over an implementation obtained from the category framework.
- However, if :meth:`_get_action_` returns None, then
- ``self.category().parent_class._get_action_`` has a chance to
give
- a better answer.
+ .. NOTE::
+
+ If a parent implements :meth:`_get_action_` then it has
precedence
+ over an implementation obtained from the category framework.
+ However, if :meth:`_get_action_` returns ``None``, then
+ ``self.category().parent_class._get_action_`` has a chance to
give
+ a better answer.
}}}
Also +1 to cythonizing (key components of)
`CombinatorialFreeModule(Element)`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18756#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
