#6685: [with patch, positive review] include pictures in the reference manual 
and
notebook introspection
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
 Reporter:  jhpalmieri                   |        Owner:  tba              
     Type:  enhancement                  |       Status:  closed           
 Priority:  major                        |    Milestone:  sage-4.1.2       
Component:  documentation                |   Resolution:  fixed            
 Keywords:                               |     Reviewer:  Dan Drake        
   Author:  John Palmieri, Mitesh Patel  |       Merged:  Sage 4.1.2.alpha0
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
Changes (by mvngu):

  * status:  new => closed
  * resolution:  => fixed
  * merged:  => Sage 4.1.2.alpha0


Comment:

 Merged `trac_6685-proposal.patch`.
 [[BR]][[BR]]
 While doctesting with the above patch, I had the following failure:
 {{{
 sage -t -long devel/sage-main/sage/misc/getusage.py
 **********************************************************************
 File "/scratch/mvngu/release/sage-4.1.1/devel/sage-
 main/sage/misc/getusage.py", line 69:
     sage: get_memory_usage(t)          # amount of memory more than when
 we defined t.
 Expected:
     0.0
 Got:
     0.34375
 **********************************************************************
 1 items had failures:
    1 of   4 in __main__.example_2
 ***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
 For whitespace errors, see the file
 /scratch/mvngu/release/sage-4.1.1/tmp/.doctest_getusage.py
          [2.5 s]
 }}}
 This is the same failure as that reported in #6819. I'm merging patches
 and testing on sage.math at a time when it has about 3 GB of free RAM out
 of a total of 120 GB. As far as I can tell, the failure is not due to the
 above patch. One can doctest the file `sage/misc/getusage.py` with or
 without the patch and still occasionally gets that failure.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6685#comment:13>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to