#18454: New `random_cone()` function
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mjo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: geometry | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Michael Orlitzky | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/mjo/ticket/18454 | 7bdaf1cd51d8f6f3007f11888991cefc186a4ee1
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by mjo):
Replying to [comment:7 novoselt]:
Is there anything I can do to help get this reviewed? Bribery and/or trade
reviews?
I have a bunch of "easy" (new method) tickets in the pipeline for a paper
I'm working on, and I've used random testing for many of the properties in
those tickets. I'd like to be able to cite Sage in the paper (and vice-
versa) as a working implementation if we can get the algorithm merged in
time.
If there are any implementation bugs, the output is either random or an
error so I can just fix them and no one should notice =)
I'm happy to seek out other reviewers if you'd prefer, but I know the cone
code is your baby so I'd prefer that you review it if you can.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18454#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
