#17030: Knot Theory as a part of GSoC 2014.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: amitjamadagni | Owner: amitjamadagni
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: algebraic | Resolution:
topology | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Miguel Marco, Karl-
Authors: Amit Jamadagni, | Dieter Crisman, Frédéric Chapoton
Miguel Marco | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | cb84cec88f012844ac65d102296644a77f89818c
public/ticket/17030 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
If Miguel thinks it is (now) mathematically solid, then I will do the
final parts of the review over the next day or so.
Some things from a quick lookthrough:
- Is the definition of the writhe valid for links? Right now the
documentation just says "of the knot".
- Methods like `alexander_polynomial` could use elaboration in their
documentation, such as their definition and/or references.
- I want to create a separate class `Knot` inheriting from `Link` to make
it easier for people expanding on this in the future (and there is already
a method specifically for knots). Any objections to me doing this?
(John just outposted me on the symlink :P ).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17030#comment:116>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
