#18987: Parallel computation for TilingSolver.number_of_solutions
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  slabbe                 |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
  enhancement            |   Resolution:
       Priority:  major  |    Merged in:
      Component:         |    Reviewers:  Vincent Delecroix
  combinatorics          |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  0c752d4038a7419285a1c1fa9b0c21842b593a2e
  Sébastien Labbé        |     Stopgaps:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  public/18987           |
   Dependencies:         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by slabbe):

 > Ok, now I understand why I needed it that way.

 Wait. I really need the quotient itself finally. I was just lucky that the
 transformation keeping some the pentamino invariant was in the group.

 {{{

     sage: from sage.combinat.tiling import ncube_isometry_group
     sage: from sage.games.quantumino import pentaminos
     sage: L = ncube_isometry_group(3)
     sage: f = lambda p : [m for m in L[1:] if (m*p).canonical() ==
 p.canonical()]
     sage: [(i, f(p)) for i,p in enumerate(pentaminos) if f(p)]
     [(6, [
     [ 0  0 -1]
     [ 0 -1  0]
     [-1  0  0]
     ]),
      (7, [
     [ 0  0  1]
     [ 0 -1  0]
     [ 1  0  0]
     ]),
      (12, [
     [-1  0  0]
     [ 0  0 -1]
     [ 0 -1  0]
     ]),
      (13, [
     [ 0  0 -1]
     [ 0 -1  0]
     [-1  0  0]
     ]),
      (16, [
     [ 0  0 -1]
     [ 0 -1  0]
     [-1  0  0]
     ])]
 }}}

 Above, I get a problem with pentamino number 7 because it is invariant
 under a transformation that is not in the subgroup isomorphic to the
 quotient. So I really need to consider the quotient with all of the
 elements in each coset. Chosing a representative won't work even if it is
 well chosen.

 Give me more time. I'll update my branch.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18987#comment:33>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to