#19004: Do not search old-style spkgs
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vbraun             |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
      Component:  build              |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Volker Braun       |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/vbraun/do_not_search_old_style_spkgs|  
a8ccb41d3e45a9d79a60a9510f1faeb90111e86f
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 on the wishlist:

 Having as answer `patch` when asking for `python` is funny ;-) And having
 `cython` first is bad as well. Could you weight the Levenshtein distance.
 Reasonable parameters for your purpose might be:
  - deletion: 1
  - addition: 1
  - exchange: 2  (so basically this would count for one deletion + one
 addition)

 `patch` would then be out if I count well (would be distance 6) and
 `cython` will appear after `python2` and `python3` (would be distance `2`
 against `1`).

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19004#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to