#19004: Do not search old-style spkgs
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vbraun | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: build | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Volker Braun | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vbraun/do_not_search_old_style_spkgs|
a8ccb41d3e45a9d79a60a9510f1faeb90111e86f
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jhpalmieri):
So what will happen to the `p_group_cohomology` package, for example? Will
it completely disappear from the lists of available packages? If this is
the plan, then I object. We would need some sort of official deprecation
period for old-style packages, and at the end of that period (which could
be strictly enforced, unlike some of our other deprecation time tables),
then we delete all old-style packages.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19004#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.