#19016: A more naive sage.structure.element.__hash__
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.9
defect | Resolution:
Priority: | Merged in:
blocker | Reviewers:
Component: misc | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | 754dc5794a1a7004c8844cf7cfb64220957c36a5
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/19016 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> -1 to a constant hash. That leads to such bad performance that it
amounts to "wrong results".
>
> +1 to removing silly default hashes. Hashing is simply not something
that can be done on a very general level.
What is your position for "constant hash" Vs "we change nothing and the
bug stays"? How many classes do you think would be broken (and would have
to be fixed) if this hash is removed? Are you willing to help?
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19016#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
