#19016: A more naive sage.structure.element.__hash__
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
       Reporter:         |        Owner:
  ncohen                 |       Status:  needs_review
           Type:         |    Milestone:  sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix
  defect                 |   Resolution:
       Priority:         |    Merged in:
  blocker                |    Reviewers:
      Component:  misc   |  Work issues:
       Keywords:         |       Commit:
        Authors:         |  754dc5794a1a7004c8844cf7cfb64220957c36a5
  Nathann Cohen          |     Stopgaps:
Report Upstream:  N/A    |
         Branch:         |
  u/ncohen/19016         |
   Dependencies:         |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by vdelecroix):

 * status:  positive_review => needs_review


Comment:

 As I said in [comment:9] I did remove the stupid `__hash__` from
 `SageObject` (this is #18246). Not setting it to `0` but making it raise a
 `TypeError`. It was not a tremendous effort even if I had to dig in things
 that I do not understand.

 I guess that the same strategy would also be good for `Element` and I
 agree with Nils on this. The warning option proposed in [comment:4] by
 Nathann looks also good to me because each time you program something you
 will notice that you are doing something wrong. Could we try to found a
 solution? This is annoying and I am willing to help to fix it.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19016#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to