#19009: upgrade flint to 2.5.2
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: packages: | Resolution:
standard | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: François Bissey
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Work issues:
Report Upstream: Reported | Commit:
upstream. Developers acknowledge | 88fe9081e745cc06158b537989221d4b9e9cdafb
bug. | Stopgaps:
Branch: |
u/vdelecroix/19009 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by fbissey):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
Old description:
> flint 2.5.2 is out. Upstream tarball is here
>
> [http://flintlib.org/flint-2.5.2.tar.gz
> http://flintlib.org/flint-2.5.2.tar.gz]
>
> flint 2.5.1 was out! But bugous on some platform.
>
> flint-2.5 was out few times before but suffers some serious problem:
>
> Problem 1: ldconfig was not found
>
> - [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/flint-devel/mNAjYCF5glM thread
> on flint-devel]
> - [https://github.com/wbhart/flint2/issues/176 issue 176]
>
> Problem 2: `nmod_mat_cols` vs `nmod_mat_ncols`
>
> - [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/flint-devel/W67SB7pTMR4 thread
> on flint-devel]
> - [https://github.com/wbhart/flint2/issues/174 issue 174]
>
> The fixes to these two problems are incorporated in flint-2.5.1.
New description:
flint 2.5.2 is out. Upstream tarball is here
[http://flintlib.org/flint-2.5.2.tar.gz
http://flintlib.org/flint-2.5.2.tar.gz]
All interesting patches integrated upstream.
--
Comment:
Replying to [comment:35 wbhart]:
> I don't know why, but putting a - in from of $LDCONFIG didn't actually
work. It just said,
>
> /bin/sh: 2: -ldconfig: not found
>
> So much for removing the minus before passing it to the shell!
>
> Edit: ok it works if I put it earlier. It obviously considers the whole
block a "line".
Looking back at it, yes of course not just the `ldconfig` call. I am not
even sure I want to call it a block when you use a continuation line.
I am putting this back to positive review.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19009#comment:50>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
