#18987: Parallel computation for TilingSolver.number_of_solutions
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
slabbe | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.9
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Vincent Delecroix
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | 0d68ecec28cb92d9e78a92d6e733d42b3e8941c1
Sébastien Labbé | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/18987 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by slabbe):
> Moreover, everything would be faster if you would store integer vectors
instead of tuples (and an attribute `self._free_module`). Why aren't you
doing that?
1. Because I think I wanted to use the most basic hashable container
(tuple) for the need. I realized only recently that it was slow because
there are many matrix operations and additions involved. So indeed,
storing vectors would be better.
2. Because it is not the purpose of this ticket.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18987#comment:56>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
