#18987: Parallel computation for TilingSolver.number_of_solutions
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
slabbe | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.9
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: | Reviewers: Vincent Delecroix
combinatorics | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | 0d68ecec28cb92d9e78a92d6e733d42b3e8941c1
Sébastien Labbé | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/18987 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by slabbe):
caching `ncube_isometry_group` gives:
{{{
sage: from sage.games.quantumino import QuantuminoSolver
sage: q = QuantuminoSolver(0)
sage: t = q.tiling_solver()
sage: time rows = t.rows()
CPU times: user 18.8 s, sys: 168 ms, total: 19 s
Wall time: 19 s
}}}
not caching `ncube_isometry_group` gives:
{{{
sage: from sage.games.quantumino import QuantuminoSolver
sage: q = QuantuminoSolver(0)
sage: t = q.tiling_solver()
sage: time rows = t.rows()
CPU times: user 19.4 s, sys: 288 ms, total: 19.7 s
Wall time: 20 s
}}}
So I confirm that I don't lose relatively much time by not caching.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18987#comment:52>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
