#18740: Reduce overhead for relative number field elements
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: pbruin | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: number fields | Resolution:
Keywords: relative number | Merged in:
field pari | Reviewers:
Authors: Peter Bruin | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | c661096b45e80a7227eba537ae1f7dc9e3836c1d
u/pbruin/18740-relative_number_fields| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #18727, #18739 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by vdelecroix):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
* milestone: sage-6.8 => sage-6.9
Comment:
Hello Peter,
Instead of
{{{
f = pari(self._coefficients()).Polrev()
return f.change_variable_name(name)
}}}
you can do
{{{
return pari(self._coefficients()).Polrev(name)
}}}
that would avoid a copy.
Why did you rename `_rnf_equations` into `_rnfeq`. I understand that
`relative_number_field_equations` is a bit long but the Sage standard is
more toward no abbreviation at all. Is the name `rnfeq` standard in
PARI/GP?
Vincent
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18740#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
