#18972: twographs and Seidel switching
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  dimpase            |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
      Component:  graph theory       |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:                     |    Reviewers:  Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/dimpase/seidelsw                 |  25eec1b6d18bb021eccd4b04774111097ff8f3b5
   Dependencies:  #18960, #18948,    |     Stopgaps:
  #18988, #18991, #18986, #19018,    |
  #19019                             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 > This is actually just not true. `is_regular+is_uniform(k=3)` is
 equivalent
 > to `is_t_design(t=1, k=3)`.

 True.

 > In fact, all I need `is_uniform(k=3)`, which is equivalent to to
 `is_t_design(k=3)`.

 It is equivalent in term of answers but not in terms of running time,
 though. So please use `T.is_uniform`, whose intent is also much clearer.

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18972#comment:116>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to