#18972: twographs and Seidel switching
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: dimpase | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/dimpase/seidelsw | 25eec1b6d18bb021eccd4b04774111097ff8f3b5
Dependencies: #18960, #18948, | Stopgaps:
#18988, #18991, #18986, #19018, |
#19019 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:122 ncohen]:
> > May I refer to a precedent of having classes in `design` catalog to
have `TwoGraph` here?
>
> An error is not a 'precedent'.
A precedent is a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent precedent], and
reviewers are to act in a fair and objective manner, akin to judges in a
legal system, right?
An "error", approved by something or somebody whose authority you
recognise, is a precedent.
Either you object to this authority, in an acceptable way, e.g. you open a
ticket removing that "error", and actually get it reviewed and removed
(just shouting about it is not enough, sorry). Or it stays as it is, and
then you have no authority to overrule the precedent.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18972#comment:123>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
