#18972: twographs and Seidel switching
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  dimpase            |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.9
      Component:  graph theory       |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:                     |    Reviewers:  Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/dimpase/seidelsw                 |  25eec1b6d18bb021eccd4b04774111097ff8f3b5
   Dependencies:  #18960, #18948,    |     Stopgaps:
  #18988, #18991, #18986, #19018,    |
  #19019                             |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ncohen):

 > A precedent is a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precedent precedent],
 and reviewers are to act in a fair and objective manner, akin to judges in
 a legal system, right?

 Come on Dima, don't build up on top of this idea. Do you really need to be
 convinced that "sometimes, we make mistakes"? Never saw one? Never did
 one?

 In this case it is even easier. I am 100% sure (did not check) that I did
 this myself Or that I was the one who reviewed it.

 > An "error", approved by something or somebody whose authority you
 recognise, is a precedent.

 Excellent. Then let us say that I disregard my own authority.

 > Either you object to this authority

 I just did it in my head.

 > in an acceptable way

 I found it acceptable

 > e.g. you open a ticket removing that "error", and actually get it
 reviewed and removed (just shouting about it is not enough, sorry). Or it
 stays as it is, and then you have no authority to overrule the precedent.

 Oh, I plan to remove it, no problem there.

 > anyhow, if you are still not convinced, I can remove this thing from
 designs..

 Please do. And I will remove the others, unless the thread on Sage-devel
 indicates that we should keep them instead.

 Nathann

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18972#comment:125>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to