#18941: Poset documentation polishing: chains and antichains
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers: Kevin Dilks
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/poset_polishing_chains| fc7d6a56de2a3dc24003adfa5fddfbb711ca143b
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jmantysalo):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
* milestone: sage-6.8 => sage-6.9
Comment:
Replying to [comment:19 ncohen]:
> > Because I (as always...) didn't think about the code but about the
user. They were on `EXAMPLES`-part, and I think they were not all needed
to show the idea of the function. Do you want me to add a `TESTS`-part?
>
> Yep yep, you can move them to a "TESTS" section if you think they do not
bring anything to the user.
OK, I'll do that. (And hope that `TESTS` will be foldable or hidden part
some day.)
I should also add `is_antichain_of_poset()` to `SEEALSO`. As #19078 shows
red, I can do this now and correct it later.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18941#comment:20>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.