#18941: Poset documentation polishing: chains and antichains
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.9
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers: Kevin Dilks
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/poset_polishing_chains| ecb16e648cdff2cb22bc88c7fd01f114af8006a5
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jmantysalo):
Replying to [comment:23 ncohen]:
> - This should work, and it does not:
> {{{
> sage: posets.DiamondPoset(4).is_chain_of_poset(iter([3]),ordered=True)
> ...
> TypeError: ordered=True not compatible with type <type 'listiterator'>
for elms
> }}}
Arghs. Just noticed that this does not work in Sage even before this
patch. It the right correction
{{{
if not hasattr(elms, '__getitem__'):
sorted_o = elms
else:
sorted_o = list(elms)
}}}
? Or is there still something more to think about?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18941#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.