#6750: [with spkg, positive review] New version of optional Group Cohomology 
spkg
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  SimonKing          |       Owner:  SimonKing              
     Type:  enhancement        |      Status:  assigned               
 Priority:  major              |   Milestone:                         
Component:  optional packages  |    Keywords:  cohomology ring p-group
 Reviewer:                     |      Author:  Simon King             
   Merged:                     |  
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment(by jhpalmieri):

 Replying to [comment:43 SimonKing]:
 > Dear John,
 >
 > Replying to [comment:42 jhpalmieri]:
 > > There is a theorem for it.  Look in ''Complex cobordism and stable
 homotopy groups of spheres'' by Ravenel, Appendix A1.4.
 > > According to A1.4.6, up to a sign, b<x1, x2, ...> is contained in
 <bx1, x2, ...>, and similarly for the last position.
 >
 > Thank you for your hint!
 >
 > Ravenel says "In most cases the first page or two of the file is blank.
 These files are in the process of being revised and should not be quoted
 publicly."
 >
 > So, it seems that I can not cite the theorems from his book. Or is the
 numbering in the printed version the same?

 The numbering I gave you is from the first edition of the book; the
 numbering in the on-line version is from a pre-print of the second
 edition, which has now been published.  I would guess that the numbering
 is probably the same in the published version of the second edition, but
 you could also just say "Section A1.4".

 > > There is also an addition formula: see A1.4.5 in Ravenel.  If you can
 provide doctests for some of these in some examples, that would be great.
 >
 > This theorem refers to the matric Massey product. If I understand
 correctly (but I am not an expert) what I implemented is not the matric
 version of the Massey products. So, can you explain how I can create an
 example out of Addition Theorem?

 You're right, I'm not sure what to do with the matrices there.  But
 doctests for the juggling theorem are great -- thanks!

 I'm not good enough with group cohomology to come up with other examples
 to test this out; I think your doctests (and the evidence of the success
 of the juggling theorems) is enough for me to give this a positive review.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6750#comment:45>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to