#6750: [with spkg, needs review] New version of optional Group Cohomology spkg
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner: SimonKing
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: optional packages | Keywords: cohomology ring p-group
Reviewer: | Author: Simon King
Merged: |
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment(by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:34 jhpalmieri]:
> Okay, the newest version builds on both 32-bit and 64-bit, whether I
have "MAKE" set to "make -j2" or not.
Great!
So, my homework for today is to try to find and fix the doc test that uses
sets or dictionaries (there has been a remark of William on sage-devel or
sage-support concerning doc tests that use dictionaries). Indeed you are
right, in the failing doc test we have the same sets in different order.
Concerning "a 8-cochain" to "an 8-cochain": Normally I try to be
grammatically correct (as much as possible for me, a non-native speaker).
If you look at some of the doc-tests, you will see that I use 1st, 2nd,
3rd, 101st and so on, rather than always doing {{{"%d-th"%n}}}. But I
would prefer to do this change in the next version.
Cheers,
Simon
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6750#comment:35>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
