#19226: some (collinearity graphs of) GQ(q-1,q+1)
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
dimpase | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.9
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: graph | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: Dima | 605b2dfc685a8eb0e3caf1163a0adad5c47b9f9a
Pasechnik | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/dimpase/GQ |
Dependencies: |
#19136 |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:34 ncohen]:
> Having this function is a good idea, but to me it's orthogonal to the
naming issue. It seems that 90% of those who commented the sage-devel
thread stand for the full name.
As I write this, these brave abbreviation fighters must be busily working
on a large number of tickets removing all the abbreviations from Sage
function names... Perhaps you should join them, it's by far more important
than this ticket. Death to all abbreviation in Sage, Victory or Death!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19226#comment:35>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
