#19226: some (collinearity graphs of) GQ(q-1,q+1)
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
dimpase | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.9
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: graph | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: Dima | b73b175cbcc8aa8a28a84cfb3466d058406e48c4
Pasechnik | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/dimpase/GQ |
Dependencies: |
#19136 |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> While GQ is as acceptable abbreviation as LP, and LP is used a lot in
Sage code and docs, I realise that I should have been more careful there,
sorry...
Update the LP doc to replace it by `Linear Programming` if you think that
it is necessary. I've been studying graph theory for the last 7 years or
so and I wouldn't recognize GQ if I was told that "This graph is a GQ".
Can't say the same for "This problem has a LP formulation".
Update those functions. It costs you nothing, and it will help people who
look for those graphs.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19226#comment:27>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
