#19226: some (collinearity graphs of) GQ(q-1,q+1)
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
dimpase | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.9
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: graph | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: Dima | b73b175cbcc8aa8a28a84cfb3466d058406e48c4
Pasechnik | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/dimpase/GQ |
Dependencies: |
#19136 |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:27 ncohen]:
> > While GQ is as acceptable abbreviation as LP, and LP is used a lot in
Sage code and docs, I realise that I should have been more careful there,
sorry...
>
> Update the LP doc to replace it by `Linear Programming` if you think
that it is necessary.
Why? I am totally happy with LP, and GQ, as well.
>I've been studying graph theory for the last 7 years or so and I wouldn't
recognize GQ if I was told that "This graph is a GQ".
If a user did not hear about generelised quadrangles then having is
spelled out fully in the function name makes no difference for the user.
If the user did hear about them then it's very likely that the abbreviated
form was also used, and is thus meaningful.
No, sorry, I'm not going to name anything
`BlahBlahCollinearityGraphOfGeneralisedQuadrangleGraph`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19226#comment:30>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
