#18514: Upgrade of group cohomology spkg
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: packages: | Resolution:
optional | Merged in:
Keywords: group cohomology | Reviewers:
Authors: Simon King | Work issues: Create a new-style
Report Upstream: None of the above | package with least effort
- read trac for reasoning. | Commit:
Branch: | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #18494 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:73 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:72 SimonKing]:
> > OK, then !MeatAxe is doing it wrong as well
> Absolutely. Don't use the meataxe build system as an example.
>
> > Can you point me to a good introduction to libtool?
> I don't know. For an example in Sage, you can look at the `planarity`
package.
as far as I can see, meataxe does not depend on any external libraries,
right?
Then it's really easy to autotoolize/libtoolize.
An example of a Sage package I can suggest is csdp (well, I did this
libtoolization for it :-))
https://github.com/dimpase/csdp
it's more complicated as it needs Lapack and Blas.
I'll email you a pdf of a readable book about autotools, so that you can
get an idea what's going on. (there is no readable free online up to day
text for these purposes, AFAIK).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18514#comment:74>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
