#18514: Upgrade of group cohomology spkg
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.8
Component: packages: | Resolution:
optional | Merged in:
Keywords: group cohomology | Reviewers:
Authors: Simon King | Work issues: Create a new-style
Report Upstream: None of the above | package with least effort
- read trac for reasoning. | Commit:
Branch: | ad6cea059d383bbb0a97c8430caca125d2ca78b7
u/SimonKing/upgrade_of_group_cohomology_spkg| Stopgaps:
Dependencies: #18494 |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:84 SimonKing]:
> Question to the reviewer: I made the new package depend on database_gap.
In fact, what really depends on database_gap is only the to-be-created
wrapper in the Sage library. Since database_gap is non-GPL, I think it
should only be installed (as a dependency) when the user agrees. Is that
possible with the dependency framework of packages?
No, that's not possible within the dependency framework. Also, I
personally don't think it's a good idea to add this kind of interactive
install procedures.
> Or better move the dependency to the wrapper?
The wrapper will become part of the Sage library, right? So what do you
mean with "move the dependency to the wrapper"?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18514#comment:86>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
