#19141: Poset documentation polishing: Boolean-valued properties
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jmantysalo         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  minor              |    Milestone:  sage-6.10
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  poset              |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Jori Mäntysalo     |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/jmantysalo/poset_documentation_polishing__boolean_valued_properties|  
39d1e185906821d6fcece65560e1081eb11e1493
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by kdilks):

 Replying to [comment:12 vdelecroix]:
 >  Moreover there is the notion of '''antichain''' that does not have a
 ''anti totally ordered'' counterpart.

 If we were to include an alias for checking this (which I don't think we
 should), it would be 'totally incomparable'.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19141#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to