#19141: Poset documentation polishing: Boolean-valued properties
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jmantysalo | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: poset | Merged in:
Authors: Jori Mäntysalo | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jmantysalo/poset_documentation_polishing__boolean_valued_properties|
39d1e185906821d6fcece65560e1081eb11e1493
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jmantysalo):
Replying to [comment:20 kdilks]:
> If you're working within Sage, going one step at a time, and have tab-
completion at your disposal, then the error will be easily seen. If you're
writing more complex code or are developing the source code, then it's not
clear. This isn't just a theoretical concern, this is a problem I
personally run into pretty much every time I've worked with posets.
But you will get an error message as soon as the code comes to
`is_chain(something)` or `is_chain_of_poset()`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19141#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
