#18940: Polynomials ignore the step argument in __getitem__
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: pbruin | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Peter Bruin | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/pbruin/18940-getitem_step | 1c56779b3140d12fbe5d0973cdcad0ac9dbb8054
Dependencies: #19409 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
For the record, the current definition of `pol[a:b]` was introduced with
{{{
commit ff63a1c2b5798a777dcef6a4366a43dc60a6bebd
Author: William Stein <[email protected]>
Date: Fri Jan 26 02:42:10 2007 -0800
A huge amount -- starting with writing tons of doctests for power
series, pyrex integer_ring, etc.
* changed before of polynomial and power series slicing to return
objects of the same type,
which is much more consistent.
* optimized integer constructor
* improved random number generation (e.g., ZZ.random_element())
ten times faster and more
flexible.
* separated out pmem_malloc
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18940#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
