#19152: {Real,Complex}Ball: Miscellaneous fixes and improvements
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mmezzarobba | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Marc Mezzarobba | Reviewers: Clemens Heuberger
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: public/19152-arb- | Commit:
misc | cc74b61498b0ed0e6e5a54e30df6b5cfbe33350a
Dependencies: #19063 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by cheuberg):
Replying to [comment:32 mmezzarobba]:
> Replying to [comment:30 jdemeyer]:
> > Replying to [comment:27 mmezzarobba]:
> > > Because it doesn't make any sense to me to import tons of
specialized stuff on startup.
> > We have `lazy_import` for that.
>
> I'm not talking only about the cost of the imports, but mainly about the
namespace pollution.
I would not mind having `RBF`, `CBF`, `RealBallField` and
`ComplexBallField` in the global name space; this is how most of sage
seems to work. But this could also happen in another ticket ...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19152#comment:50>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
