#19152: {Real,Complex}Ball: Miscellaneous fixes and improvements
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: mmezzarobba | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Marc Mezzarobba | Reviewers: Clemens Heuberger
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: public/19152-arb- | Commit:
misc | 0a04e627728c37d334c3576eb5243facebee0e80
Dependencies: #19063 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by cheuberg):
Replying to [comment:52 mmezzarobba]:
> Replying to [comment:50 cheuberg]:
> > I would not mind having RBF, CBF, RealBallField and ComplexBallField
in the global name space; this is how most of sage seems to work. But this
could also happen in another ticket ...
>
> Done — I still don't like that very much, but since everyone seems to
agree...
Is there a particular reason for not using `lazy_import`?
Apart from that question, all my concerns have been dealt with and as far
as I can see, Jeroen's comments are also all taken into account.
I think that #19568 is not too related to the changes in this ticket
(`RealBallField` was never marked as experimental, as that decorator did
not yet exist when it was introduced).
Therefore, I intend to set this ticket to positive as soon as the question
about lazy imports is settled.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19152#comment:59>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
