#19586: Add is_cayley_graph
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jaanos | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.10
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Cayley graphs | Merged in:
groups | Reviewers:
Authors: Janoš Vidali | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 4aaf3014fee5bb08d861636908d6733047d4a869
u/jaanos/add_is_cayley_graph | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:41 jaanos]:
> > well, how about having a proper `digraphs.CayleyGraph()` constructor?
>
> I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve here. The method being added
here is supposed to recognize Cayley graphs, no matter how they were
constructed.
a part of interface issue is that we lack `(di)graphs.CayleyGraph()`; if
it was there it would be most natural to return such a thing on success.
>
> That said, I think we do need a backend for GRAPE-like graphs (i.e.,
using an automorphism group and orbit representatives).
I have been advocating this for years, but never had time to implement it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19586#comment:42>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
